Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Here's the test addition you mentioned, though I'm really not sure it's > adding much. The source lines for both the bug/fix and the spot where we > segfault should be identical between the two cases. It's really just > about how we ended up calling into the code. True, but the "non-existing index file" case is rare enough that it would be worth to document the new way to get into the state, I would think. I am offline every other Tuesday and today is such a day, so please expect no changes to the public repositories. Thanks. > t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh b/t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh > index c1f0d95036..a0e8920ffa 100755 > --- a/t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh > +++ b/t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh > @@ -990,4 +990,9 @@ test_expect_success 'empty repo (no index) and core.untrackedCache' ' > git -C emptyrepo -c core.untrackedCache=true write-tree > ' > > +test_expect_success 'empty worktree and core.untrackedCache' ' > + git worktree add --no-checkout empty-worktree && > + git -c core.untrackedCache=true gc > +' > + > test_done
