Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Generalize 'scalar diagnose' into 'git diagnose' and 'git bugreport --diagnose'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This is an interesting point and something I think users could plausibly run
> into. I can think of a few of ways to address that:
>
> 1. Do nothing, wait for feedback from users.
> 2. Create hidden option(s) '--report' and/or '--bugreport' in 'git diagnose'
>    that trigger a warning (or advice?) along the lines of "did you mean 'git
>    bugreport --diagnose'?" and exit with 'usage()'.
> 3. Create visible options '--report' and/or '--bugreport' in 'git diagnose'
>    that invoke 'git bugreport --diagnose'.
>
> I'm leaning towards option 2, but I'd also understand not wanting to clutter
> builtins with options it *doesn't* use for the sake of advising a user.

I was leaning towards option 1, actually ;-)

I'm offline today, so please expect no changes to the public
repositories.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux