Re: [PATCH v2 21/28] submodule--helper: don't call submodule_strategy_to_string() in BUG()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Don't call submodule_strategy_to_string() in a BUG() message. These
> calls added in c51f8f94e5b (submodule--helper: run update procedures
> from C, 2021-08-24) don't need the extra information
> submodule_strategy_to_string() gives us, as we'll never reach the
> SM_UPDATE_COMMAND case here.
>
> That case is the only one where we'd get any information beyond the
> straightforward number-to-string mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  builtin/submodule--helper.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/submodule--helper.c b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
> index 955deb375ee..b49528e1ba9 100644
> --- a/builtin/submodule--helper.c
> +++ b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
> @@ -2155,8 +2155,8 @@ static int run_update_command(struct update_data *ud, int subforce)
>  		must_die_on_failure = 1;
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		BUG("unexpected update strategy type: %s",
> -		    submodule_strategy_to_string(&ud->update_strategy));
> +		BUG("unexpected update strategy type: %d",
> +		    ud->update_strategy.type);
>  	}

At first I worried that we would be losing readability by printing the
raw int value instead of a string, but then I remembered that we
probably wouldn't print anything sensible for an unknown value anyway :x

What makes this change obviously good is that we're switching on
ud->update_strategy.type, so it makes the most sense to print that value
(instead of ud->update_strategy). Unfortunately we can't see that from
the context lines though.

>  	strvec_push(&cp.args, oid);
>  
> @@ -2181,8 +2181,8 @@ static int run_update_command(struct update_data *ud, int subforce)
>  			    ud->update_strategy.command, oid, ud->displaypath);
>  			break;
>  		default:
> -			BUG("unexpected update strategy type: %s",
> -			    submodule_strategy_to_string(&ud->update_strategy));
> +			BUG("unexpected update strategy type: %d",
> +			    ud->update_strategy.type);
>  		}
>  		if (must_die_on_failure)
>  			exit(128);
> @@ -2212,8 +2212,8 @@ static int run_update_command(struct update_data *ud, int subforce)
>  		       ud->displaypath, ud->update_strategy.command, oid);
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		BUG("unexpected update strategy type: %s",
> -		    submodule_strategy_to_string(&ud->update_strategy));
> +		BUG("unexpected update strategy type: %d",
> +		    ud->update_strategy.type);
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.37.1.1233.ge8b09efaedc




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux