Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > > > For that matter, gitweb is essentially a limited porcelain. And this > > points out that all VCSes have alternative porcelains, but git is > > unusual in having convenient plumbing to support and encourage this. > > I do not consider viewers "porcelain". And gitweb is essentially just a > viewer. So you don't consider gitk to be porcelain? I do. The plumbing output of git-rev-list is uh, ugly. gitk may still not be the best looking application on the internet but it sure beats looking at rev-list output by eye. Porcelain is really anything that calls plumbing to make the task of invoking or processing the output of plumbing easier on the human using it. That's it. Obviously you can work Git by just the plumbing. Just like you can compute SHA-1 by hand. You just choose not to as the time it would take is more than you want to invest. Or have left in this mortal existance... I almost always forget about the web interfaces. There's a number of them and I don't use them often enough to really think about it. I don't know why I always forget about them. I never forget about StGit or qgit, and yet I never use those either... -- Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
