Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: >> - Squashed the two patches together. > > I see why this might have been suggested, but it definitely made it more > challenging for me to review. You see, it is easy to just fly over a patch > that simply removes the `PERL` prereq, but it is much harder to jump back > and forth over all of these removals when the `.c` version of the filter > is added before them and the `.pl` version is removed after them. Yeah, I tend to agree. > ... > Other than that, this looks great! Yup, thanks for an excellent review.
