Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Fix merge restore state

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Fix merge restore state
From: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:03:52 +0800
Cc: Git List <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>, Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <pull.1231.v5.git.1658541198.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
References: <pull.1231.v4.git.1658466942.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <pull.1231.v5.git.1658541198.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> 于2022年7月23日周六 09:53写道：
>
> This started as a simple series to fix restore_state() in builtin/merge.c,
> fixing an issue reported by ZheNing Hu[3]. It now fixes several bugs and has
> grown so much it's hard to call it simple. Anyway...
>

Thanks. This patch is good enough for me :)

References:
- [PATCH v4 0/7] Fix merge restore state
  - From: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
- [PATCH v5 0/8] Fix merge restore state
  - From: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget

Prev by Date: Re: Feature request: provide a persistent IDs on a commit
Next by Date: Re: C99 "for (int ..." form on "master"
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] Fix merge restore state
Next by thread: [PATCH] t6424: make sure a failed merge preserves local changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux