Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> From: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> merge can be invoked with uncommitted changes, including staged changes.
>> merge is responsible for restoring this state if some of the merge
>> strategies make changes. However, it was not restoring staged changes
>> due to the lack of the "--index" option to "git stash apply". Add the
>> option to fix this shortcoming.
>
> Shouldn't this be testable?
I actually take this part (which implied that the change is a good
idea) back. I think we have clearly documented for the past 17
years that you can have local changes but your index must match the
HEAD before you start your merge.
If "stash apply" vs "stash apply --index" makes any difference,
there is something wrong. We should be aborting the "git merge"
even before we even start mucking with the working tree and the
index with strategies, no? I think it is the bug, if this change
makes any difference, to be fixed---we shouldn't be proceeding to
even create a stash with index changes to begin with.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> builtin/merge.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/builtin/merge.c b/builtin/merge.c
>> index 8ce4336dd3f..2dc56fab70b 100644
>> --- a/builtin/merge.c
>> +++ b/builtin/merge.c
>> @@ -383,14 +383,14 @@ static void reset_hard(const struct object_id *oid, int verbose)
>> static void restore_state(const struct object_id *head,
>> const struct object_id *stash)
>> {
>> - const char *args[] = { "stash", "apply", NULL, NULL };
>> + const char *args[] = { "stash", "apply", "--index", NULL, NULL };
>>
>> if (is_null_oid(stash))
>> return;
>>
>> reset_hard(head, 1);
>>
>> - args[2] = oid_to_hex(stash);
>> + args[3] = oid_to_hex(stash);
>>
>> /*
>> * It is OK to ignore error here, for example when there was
>
> OK.
