Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > This just carries forward existing technical debt, but it's unfortunate > that we don't catch OPENSSL_SHA256 overridding NETTLE_SHA256, and error > if both are defined. You are mistaken, unless I am ;-) Allowing users to list whatever is available, instead of requiring all users to choose only one, is a deliberate feature in the arrangement, so it is not unfortunate and it would be breaking end-user expectation if we gave an error when more than one is given (and it would be easier to write and maintain autoconf rules for the feature---we do not want to have two places that makes decisions on precedence).
