Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@xxxxxxx> writes: >> What do you think about this old patch of mine to add a 'git praise'?: >> https://lore.kernel.org/git/20190401101246.21418-1-avarab@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Since you are asking .. I think it completely misses the point. > > I would consider it effective if users of git-praise(1) needed no > knowledge of existence of git-blame(1). I think you are the one who completely misses the point of him sending the URL (hint: what is the date of the patch?) "blame" is perfectly fine. It is the tool we use to find a commit or a series of commits to be blamed for whichever blocks of code in the current codebase we are interested in. Even if it is to find the source of the buggy or ugly code in the current codebase (i.e. "verb with negative connotation"), we are trying to put our fingers on the commit to be blamed. And it is not personal---you may find who the "author" was as a side effect of finding that offending commit, but authors write both good and bad commits, and what we are trying to find is in which commit lies the origin of the current badness. There is no need to be overly politically correct by bending the verb we use. Please do not waste our limited engineering resource on a nonsense like this. A solution for whoever do not want to type b l a m e has already been provided upthread and the discussion should end right there. Thanks.
