Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] [GSoC] bitmap: integrate a lookup table extension to the bitmap format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07-07-2022 14:18, Abhradeep Chakraborty wrote:
> 
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>>  Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt |  39 ++
>>
>> I haven't tried merging it yet, but doesn't [1/6] overlap with and
>> semantically depend on your other series that touch the formatting
>> of this file?
> 
> Correct, [1/6] indeed depends on my previous patch series[2] and it
> is assuming that that series has already been merged.

I suppose it's the opposite. A quick check shows that the patch applies
cleanly over 'master' but fails to apply over 'next' which has the
changes from your other patch series. So, the base branch for [1/6]
is 'master'. The other 5 patches clearly don't conflict.

> As far as it seems,
> it will not create any merge conflicts while merging but I am not sure.
> This would be interesting to see.
>

Since the first hunk of 1/6 and your other series touch the same area
of Documentation/technical/bitmap-format.txt, the changes conflict.
Junio might be able to handle this one. If not, you would need to look
into separate 1/6 and based it over your other series to avoid the
conflict.

--
Sivaraam



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux