Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > > > On 10/4/07, Wincent Colaiuta <win@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Am I wrong? > > > > > > About it being a majority, yes, I suspect so. > > > > > > > Maybe in the next survey we should include question "do you usually do > > 'git commit' or 'git commit -a'" :-) > > Not meaning to discourage you, but it is a known fact that Linus does "git > commit" without "-a" quite often. > > And if that were not bad enough for your plan, I myself omit "-a" > regularly. So you would get a veto from me, too. Ditto. I use `git commit` more often than `git commit -a`. Actually scratch that, I use `git gui` more often than I use `git commit -a` but the point holds. I stage things long before I ever think about what the commit message should say. Its very rare that I am committing without staging something first, usually its a one liner fix for something and the -a just is the shorter way to stage the change. Early on in my Git days I didn't grasp how *useful* it is to stage first. Now I can't work without it. At least for any change more than 1 line. :) -- Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
