On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 09:04:27PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > > Even though this comment was written in a good spirit, it is updated > > infrequently enough that is serves to confuse rather than to encourage > > I think you wanted to say, "that it serves:. Oops. Thanks for pointing it out. > > contributors to update the appropriate values when the modify the > > definition of object_entry. > > > > For that reason, eliminate the confusion by removing the comment > > altogether. > > > > Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I agree with your rationale and that we should remove this. I'm glad that you agree. Thanks, Taylor
