Re: [PATCH 5/5] Use start_comand() in builtin-fetch-pack.c instead of explicit fork/exec.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 04 October 2007 11:22, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Junio C Hamano schrieb:
> > I think Daniel and Shawn's git-fetch-in-C should graduate
> > 'master' before this series.  If you can re-send the series
> > rebased on 2b5a06edca8f7237aad6464b349b79772024d2a2 (Restore
> > default verbosity for http fetches.), it would be much
> > appreciated.
>
> Sure, will do this evening.

I've difficulties with this rebase: 2b5a06 does not compile for me due to 
7155b727c9 (Introduce remove_dir_recursively()), which needs strbuf, but that 
is not merged into this branch. I can rebase on its parent (bundle transport: 
fix an alloc_ref() call) or 17df81ff (Merge branch 'db/fetch-pack' into 
next). I'd prefer the latter since it also has strbuf.

-- Hannes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux