On 10/4/07, Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've never thought of the patch names as anything that would make > sense to export from a repository (like reflogs), so using the first > line of the commit message for mail subject (like git does) always > seemed like a no-brainer. But then I don't have any experience using > quilt or any related tool. Why are the patch name and the short description independent variables? Wouldn't it make more sense to treat these as a single unified item? If I rename the patch it would automatically edit the first line of the description, etc... When importing a patch from a saved email, stg should strip all the email headers out of the description. I have to manually fix that up. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
