Hi, On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote: > This is partial summary of Git User's Survey 2007, > ending at state from 28 September 2007. Thanks. > 26. Which porcelains do you use? > > Multiple answers (one can use more than one porcelain). > > Answer (multiple choice) | Count > ------------------------------------------ > core-git | 558 > cogito (deprecated) | 56 > > Patch management interface: : 57 > ........................................... > StGIT | 41 > Guilt (formerly gq) | 13 > pg (deprecated) | 3 > > own scripts | 95 > other | 14 > ------------------------------------------ > Base | 593 / 683 > Total (sum) | 780 > > Those 14 "other" answers make me wish to have provided "if other, > what it was?" (sub)question; actually not only for this question. git-gui, of course. I consider it porcelain, because it uses core-git as backend. In the same vein, I should consider gitk porcelain now, since it has rebase capabilities. I will not, and I am not very happy that this viewer got a non-view-only capability, instead of git-gui, where that feature should have belonged (as suggested by at least one answer to a later question in the survey -- not by me). Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
