On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:38:00PM +0530, Abhradeep Chakraborty wrote: > Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I think you mean 0x10 (b_1_0000) instead of 0xf (b_1111). > > > > I noticed when looking at the constant in patch 2. > > Yes, you're right. It's kind of embarrassment for me :) It happens ;). Let's use 0x10 instead. Thanks, Taylor
