Hi Jakub, nice work you've done there. Well done! On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Jakub Narebski wrote:
55. Would commerical (paid) support from a support vendor
be of interest to you/your organization?
Answer | Count
------------------------------------------
Not Applicable | 203
Yes | 69
No | 322
Yes + No | 391
------------------------------------------
Base | 594 / 683
Total (sum) | 594
Only 69 (12%) answers yes, 322 no, 203 not applicable (which meant
to encompass people who do not use git at and for work).
433 = 56 + 377 people participating in this survey use git for work,
or for both work and unpaid projects (as compared to 391 who answered
this question not with N/A).
Note that Git is GPLv2, and it will probably stay that forever, so you
are _free_ to start a commercial support scheme for Git, but others
are free not to choose it. This question is to get to know if there is
sufficient demand for commercial Git support for it to be viable.
Once again (AFAIR this was already raised during one of the previous summary) what's the link between GPLv2 and commercial support? You seem to imply that because Git won't move to GPLv3, it's a good thing for potential paid support, or something. I don't quite see how GPLvX comes into play with commercial support. I'm not a license expert though.
-- Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna EPITA Research and Development Laboratory
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
