On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:28:04AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I looked at an "scripted" version in the ancient past and it seems > to have computed by iterating over > > git rev-list bisect/bad --not $good_revs > > which would have given these intermediate ones roughly in the > reverse chronological order. It could be that the behaviour > regressed when the scripted version was rewritten in C, but I dunno. > > Christian (as an "area" expert for bisect), do you have any > comments? It would probably be nice to show them as --oneline, as well. I'd guess that a human reading the subjects of a handful of commits could quickly make a good guess as to the actual culprit. -Peff
