Re: [PATCH] connected: distinguish local/remote bad objects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >  builtin/fetch.c              |  2 +-
> >  connected.c                  |  1 +
> >  revision.c                   | 16 ++++++++++++--
> >  revision.h                   |  3 +++
> >  t/t5518-fetch-exit-status.sh | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> This seems to break linux-leaks CI job by making 5518, which was
> marked in some topic in flight to expect to be leak-free, fail.
> 
> Because of the way linux-leaks test framework is done, it is not
> easy to tell if the code changes essential to this topic introduced
> new leaks, in which case we would want to fix that.

Thanks. I'll recheck this once I make a new version.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux