Re: [PATCH v5] git-prompt: make colourization consistent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 6/5/22 02:26, Joakim Petersen wrote:
>> If the user is in a sparse checkout, the sparsity state indicator
>> follows a similar pattern to the short upstream state indicator.
>> However, clearing colour of the colourized indicators changes how the
>> sparsity state indicator is colourized , as it currently inherits (and
>> before the change referenced also inherited) the colour of the last
>> short state indicator before it. Reading the commit message of the
>> change that introduced the sparsity state indicator, afda36dbf3b
>> (git-prompt: include sparsity state as well, 2020-06-21), it appears
>> this colourization also was unintended, so clearing the colour for said
>> indicator further increases consistency.
>> 
>
> colourization? I have never heared that. Did you mean "colorization" (en-US)
> or "colourisation" (en-UK)? I assumed the former.

;-)  

Either way, that word is a mouthful.  Using verb "to color" and
"coloring" might be easier to read, perhaps?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux