Joakim Petersen <joak-pet@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > That does seem like a much better idea for maintainability, I can > change the patch to do this instead. I have one question, though: the > sequence $c$b (bare state and branch name) is a special case, where > they're intended to have the same colour, should I wrap both in colour > set, colour clear, or only clear after $b? If we want to allow $c and $b appear in different places (which I have no opinion on), I would say we should just color them independently and fix the test that expects the close linkage between the two. I offhand see no reason that they _must_ stay together myself, though. Thanks.