Re: CVE-2022-24975

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Esler <mark.esler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Could the git developers state their position on CVE-2022-24975? Is it
> disputed or will it be addressed by upstream?
>
> As I read the documentation, --mirror is working as stated and MITRE
> should remove the CVE.
>
> Thank you,
> Mark Esler

It took me a while to Google for "gitbleed" as I got tons of GI
bleed but no Gitbleed, so a quick conclusion is there is no such
credible thing called gitbleed ;-)

Jokes aside (yes, I know about [*]).

As you said, "A repository can have more than what branch heads and
tags can reach, and the --mirror option is a way to copy all the
things that are reachable from other refs.  It is 100% working as
intended."

During the discussion about [*] on git-security@ mailing lsit,
everybody said that it is dubious that CVE is warranted.  I am not
sure there is anything more for us to do.


[Reference]

* https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2022/02/11/gitbleed/

  the author of which asked git-security@ list and after getting
  things explained, accepted that this is a "working as intended"
  functionality and promised to adjust the blog post entry not to
  imply that the entire repository can be copied.  I do not know how
  much correction was actually made since then, though.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux