Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> If that is the case, then I am OK to merge this to 'next' to cast it >> in stone, and then the let "rebuild the base" part once die, to be >> reborn as many "tweak the way things work to (clarify|optimize) X" >> follow-up topics. >> > I'm not sure 'ab/ci-setup-simplify' would need to "die", more that it would > be adjusted to rebase on top of an updated 'next' (including > 'js/ci-github-workflow-markup'). Yeah, that is much closer to what I meant to say. The one that wants to build directly on top of 'master' would need to be retired, because Dscho's series makes quite a lot of overlapping changes, and it no longer would be "GitHub workflow is built on top of this rearchitected foundation" anymore. > That said, a re-sent version focusing on > its own optimizations/improvements (rather than a comparisons against an IMO > largely unrelated series) would almost certainly benefit both the series and > its readers. Thanks.
