On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 03:44:00PM -0400, rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I am again concerned about 32-bit time_t assumptions. time_t is 32-bit on > some platforms, signed/unsigned, and sometimes 64-bit. We are talking about > potentially long-persistent files, as I understand this series, so we should > not be limiting times to end at 2038. That's only 16 years off and I would > wager that many clones that exist today will exist then. Note that we're using unsigned fields here, so we have until 2106 (see my earlier response on this in https://lore.kernel.org/git/YdiXecK6fAKl8++G@nand.local/). Thanks, Taylor
