Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I can't really send an incremental fix because the final content > as it is in 'next' already is OK; it's just that some content which was added > in patch 2/5 should have been added in 1/5 instead. > > It's that too big of a deal, I just wanted to let you know. Ah, I mis-read you then. Such a misdivision may technically break bisectability, but hopefully nobody bisects the documentation changes and I do not think we should be worried too much about it. Thanks.
