Hi Neeraj, On Thu, 19 May 2022, Neeraj Singh wrote: > On 5/19/2022 2:47 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > nksingh85@xxxxxxxxx writes: > > > > > > > From: Neeraj Singh <neerajsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > GGG closed this series erroneously, so I'm trying out > > > > git-send-email. Apologies for any mistakes. > > > > > > > > This series is also available at > > > > https://github.com/neerajsi-msft/git/git.git ns/batched-fsync-v6. > > > > > > > > V6 changes: > > > > We haven't heard anything on this topic from anybody for this round. > > I am planning to merge it to 'next' soonish. > > > > Please speak up if anybody has concerns. > > > > Thanks. > > > > No updates on my end. I'll keep my eyes out for any reports of regression. I asked a colleague to have a go with these patches and the only concern I heard back was that with ext4's new `fast_commit` feature, the `fsync` seems not to actually flush all metadata. They indicated that they'd be happy with merely documenting this issue, and also pointed out that the `fast_commit` feature seems still not to be considered ready for production workloads. So: 👍 from my side. Ciao, Dscho
