Hi Junio, On Sun, 22 May 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > I see that this is still with the previous iteration, and therefore > > exposes the same speed (or slowness) as was investigated so wonderfully by > > Victoria. > > > > So I really do not understand why you pointed to that run, given that it > > Simply because your updated version came to my tree a lot after I > prepared two trees that are otherwise identical for comparison to > write the message you are responding to. Oh sorry, I only noticed that your mail came in after I sent the new iteration, and I incorrectly thought that you had put the patch series into the Stalled/To-Drop pile, so I assumed that your mail was in response to my new iteration. I had missed that you replied to v2 instead of to v3. > I do not appreciate that you have to always talk back to others in > such an aggressive tone I apologize for that. As you might have guessed, it was not my intention to be aggressive in any way. I merely meant to express my puzzlement, and your explanation resolved that very nicely. Thank you, Dscho
