Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I was worried about the robustness of the test, but some deeper diving >> revealed that it should produce consistent results. Otherwise, the fix >> itself is a straightforward (albeit hard to find in the first place). These >> two patches look good to me! >> >>> Thanks in advance for your review. > > I'm chiming in to say that I also read these patches and think they > are good. Couldn't find a way to improve them. Thanks, all. Queued.
