Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, May 18 2022, Taylor Blau wrote:
>
> Nit:
>
>> + - A 4-byte magic number '0x4d544d45' ('MTME').
>> +
>> + - A 4-byte version identifier (= 1).
>> +
>> + - A 4-byte hash function identifier (= 1 for SHA-1, 2 for SHA-256).
>
> Here we let it suffice that later we'll say "All 4-byte numbers are in
> network order".
>
>> + - A table of 4-byte unsigned integers in network order. The ith
>
> But here we call out "network order" explicitly, shouldn't this just be
> s/ in network order//?
>
>> + value is the modification time (mtime) of the ith object in the
>> + corresponding pack by lexicographic (index) order. The mtimes
>> + count standard epoch seconds.
>> +
>> + - A trailer, containing a checksum of the corresponding packfile,
>> + and a checksum of all of the above (each having length according
>> + to the specified hash function).
>> +
>> +All 4-byte numbers are in network order.
>
> I.e. this is sufficient.
Very good eyes. One explicit mention among several others can
indeed be misleading the readers.
When asked for "network order", all your search engines show are
entries about "network byte order", so let's use that longer form of
spelling.
Thanks.
