On Wed, May 18 2022, Taylor Blau wrote: > When using cruft packs, the following race can occur when a geometric > repack that writes a MIDX bitmap takes place afterwords: > > - First, create an unreachable object and do an all-into-one cruft > repack which stores that object in the repository's cruft pack. > - Then make that object reachable. > - Finally, do a geometric repack and write a MIDX bitmap. > > Assuming that we are sufficiently unlucky as to select a commit from the > MIDX which reaches that object for bitmapping, then the `git > multi-pack-index` process will complain that that object is missing. > > The reason is because we don't include cruft packs in the MIDX when > doing a geometric repack. Since the "make that object reachable" doesn't > necessarily mean that we'll create a new copy of that object in one of > the packs that will get rolled up as part of a geometric repack, it's > possible that the MIDX won't see any copies of that now-reachable > object. > > Of course, it's desirable to avoid including cruft packs in the MIDX > because it causes the MIDX to store a bunch of objects which are likely > to get thrown away. But excluding that pack does open us up to the above > race. > > This patch demonstrates the bug, and resolves it by including cruft > packs in the MIDX even when doing a geometric repack. > > Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > builtin/repack.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- > t/t5329-pack-objects-cruft.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/builtin/repack.c b/builtin/repack.c > index 36d1f03671..e9e3a2b4e3 100644 > --- a/builtin/repack.c > +++ b/builtin/repack.c > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > #define PACK_CRUFT 4 > > #define DELETE_PACK 1 > +#define CRUFT_PACK 2 > > static int pack_everything; > static int delta_base_offset = 1; > @@ -161,8 +162,11 @@ static void collect_pack_filenames(struct string_list *fname_nonkept_list, > if ((extra_keep->nr > 0 && i < extra_keep->nr) || > (file_exists(mkpath("%s/%s.keep", packdir, fname)))) > string_list_append_nodup(fname_kept_list, fname); > - else > - string_list_append_nodup(fname_nonkept_list, fname); > + else { > + struct string_list_item *item = string_list_append_nodup(fname_nonkept_list, fname); Nit: very long line, and we end up with {} just on the else, not the if.