On May 18, 2022 2:09 PM Junio C Hamano wrote: ><rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Could this be a fallback position where nftw() is not available? I am >> not how broadly nftw() is supported but it appears to do what you are >> looking for. > >Yeah, nftw() sounds like a better approach than what we have been doing for the >past decade by writing our own iterator. Not to mention being blindingly faster and lower resource usage on some "exotic" platforms 😊
