On 5/17/2022 1:37 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * tb/midx-race-in-pack-objects (2022-05-13) 2 commits > - builtin/pack-objects.c: ensure pack validity from MIDX bitmap objects > - pack-bitmap: check preferred pack validity when opening MIDX bitmap > > The multi-pack-index code did not protect the packfile it is going > to depend on from getting removed while in use, which has been > corrected. > > Will merge to 'next'? > source: <cover.1652458395.git.me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Looking at the conversation here, I would change this to "expecting a re-roll". > * ab/valgrind-fixes (2022-05-12) 4 commits > (merged to 'next' on 2022-05-16 at 75d760528f) > + commit-graph.c: don't assume that stat() succeeds > + object-file: fix a unpack_loose_header() regression in 3b6a8db3b03 > + log test: skip a failing mkstemp() test under valgrind > + tests: using custom GIT_EXEC_PATH breaks --valgrind tests > (this branch is used by ds/object-file-unpack-loose-header-fix.) > > A bit of test framework fixes with a few fixes to issues found by > valgrind. > > Will merge to 'master'. > source: <20220512223218.237544-1-gitster@xxxxxxxxx> ... > * ds/object-file-unpack-loose-header-fix (2022-05-16) 1 commit > - object-file: convert 'switch' back to 'if' > (this branch uses ab/valgrind-fixes.) > > Coding style fix. > > Will merge to 'next'? > source: <377be0e9-8a0f-4a86-0a66-3b08c0284dae@xxxxxxxxxx> With ab/valgrind-fixes in 'next', I think this is an easy one to merge. I'm calling it out here since the patch was hidden in the review of ab/valgrind-fixes. Thanks, -Stolee
