Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > We used to die unless READ_NORMAL was returned, so the code after > packet_reader_peek() can rely on reader->line to be populated. Now > that code must handle cases where an earlier _peek() gave something > other than READ_NORMAL and in such an error case reader->line points > at NULL. So any code that assumed reader->line was populated needs > to be updated. > > Makes sense. Thanks for taking a look. Yes, that's correct.
