Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If majority of partial-clone users find it unnecessary noise, then > it may be an upside to give only reduced summary that is less than > full that may be given by `remote -v -v`. Should I add this to `remote -v -v` then? `remote -vv` is currently not implemented I guess. > Perhaps tagged output that can be easier to parse would be better > "extensible" output format for adding more random pieces of > information than going tabular. I dunno. I am not sure what exactly you are refering by 'tagged output' but it is true that tabular form is hard to parse. That's why I suggested `--raw` flag which would be used for parsing. It would give the info following the currently implemented format. If you like the tagged output format, then should we implement `-vv` which would give the output as the tagged output format and also can be extended?
