Re: Problems setting up bare repository (git 1.5.3.3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sean <seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:23:39 -0700
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> If your push were "next~27^2:frotz", it becomes even less clear.
>> It may be that I am pushing out the tip of a topic branch I
>> usually do not push out, so it would be easier for some specific
>> person to build on top of.  Or maybe I am marking that place as
>> a lightweight tag.  They are equally likely.
>
> But you could pick a reasonable default in assuming that a new
> branch is desired with the above example.  If someone wants to
> push a tag, they can create the tag locally, and then push it.

I think you are on the same page.

We can pick _a_ default, and tell people that if they want a
non-default behaviour, they have to be explicit.  That goes
without saying.

The discussion between Johannes and I was about picking what
default is _reasonable_; Johannes made it sound like branches
are norm and tags are oddball.  I was merely pointing out that
it won't be so cut-and-dried.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux