Re: [PATCH] Adding rebase merge strategy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Tom Clarke" <tom@xxxxxxx> writes:

> So it's perhaps the question is whether rebasing should be treated as
> a kind of merging, or as an alternative to merging when pulling.
> Incidentally, are there any other cases other than pulling where using
> rebase as an alternative merge strategy is useful?

Very well put; I like concise summary of the point in a
discussion thread like this.

And the question in your last sentence is not merely incidental,
but I think is the most crucial one to decide which way we
should proceed.

I do not offhand think of a place other than "git pull" that
would make sense to sometimes be able to rebase when you
normally use merge, so I am inclined to say it would be easier
to teach that "'git pull' is usually a 'git fetch' followed by
'git merge', but in certain workflow it is handier to 'git
fetch' and then 'git rebase', and here are the ways to get the
rebasing behaviour...".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux