Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] bisect: output state before we are ready to compute bisection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau writes:
Could or should these printf()'s be advise() calls instead? That would
make it easier for users to turn them off if they don't want the extra
output. At the very least, we should make sure that they are sent to
stderr to discourage scripting around them.

Ah, I didn't know about advise(); looks like it could be reasonable to use here. If nobody objects, I'll change to advise() when the rest of the feedback has come in and v3 is sent.

Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux