Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] transport: add client side capability to request object-info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> RTT more than necessary. We could just determine if the server supports
> the attributes we want by using capabilities (without needing to send
> the request to check).

Hmph.  capabilities may cut in both ways, though.

Those clients that are not interested in object-info at all (which
are the majority of case where people clone, fetch or ls-remote),
they do not even need to know what kind of object attributes the
object-info command is prepared to report, and they would appreciate
not having to spend any extra byte in the capability-advertisement.

Of course, for object-info clients, having it upfront does make
things simpler.

So...





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux