Re: [PATCH 0/9] Incremental po/git.pot update and new l10n workflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I haven't applied the patches and, for me, the prior workflow has no
issues.

Improving the po files in order to not have the 'diff noise' is
something that I consider ok, but still, I also don't see problems
with how it is now. So, it is the only thing that I consider an
improvement, from what I have read.

I believe in eliminating work for the translation team, as much as
possible, not in increasing our work load.

The translation file is already big enough, in terms of translation
needing to be done.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux