Carlo Arenas <carenas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Overall, I like the simplicity and clarity of "do not start this >> test as 'root'" in the previous round much better. > > I disagree, and think that the fact that the second test changes > behaviour with this series proves my point. I do not know which second test you are talking about, but anyway. > Either Way those issues are orthogonal to this change and would be > happy to discuss again after v3 which is still not ready and will be > posted most likely as an RFC including as much as can from the > feedback provided so far. Sure. Looking forward to seeing a version that does *NOT* abuse prerequisite mechanism. We are interested in testing an ordinary user becoming root via sudo in these tests, so reject whoever starts the test under 'root' upfront like in the earlier round. Thanks.
