On 4/25/2022 1:49 PM, Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget wrote: > This series, in combination with the sparse index integrations of reset [1], > update-index [2], checkout-index [2], clean [2], and read-tree [3], allows > most subcommands of 'git stash' to use the sparse index end-to-end without > index expansion. I'm really excited to see this culmination of your work in this area! > Performance results (from the 'p2000' tests): > > (git stash && > git stash pop) master this series > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > full-v3 4.07(2.42+1.34) 3.98(2.42+1.32) -2.2% > full-v4 4.05(2.46+1.31) 4.00(2.49+1.29) -1.2% > sparse-v3 7.48(4.81+2.57) 1.53(0.26+1.61) -79.5% > sparse-v4 7.35(4.74+2.54) 1.59(0.27+1.63) -78.4% > > (echo >>new && > git stash -u && > git stash pop) master this series > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > full-v3 4.21(2.62+1.45) 4.11(2.55+1.44) -2.4% > full-v4 4.11(2.51+1.41) 4.02(2.49+1.41) -2.2% > sparse-v3 7.35(4.64+2.66) 1.70(0.32+1.64) -76.9% > sparse-v4 7.74(4.87+2.83) 1.70(0.32+1.66) -78.0% I wanted to add some performance results from real-world users of an internal monorepo. These are numbers for all runs of "git stash", so it is not broken down by subcommand: Index Type P50 P80 P99 --------------------------------------- Full Index 13.3s 26.3s 47.5s Sparse Index 2.1s 5.8s 9.4s Thanks, -Stolee
