Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > First. I see you re-queued a the v2 of Johannes's patches. I had some > outstanding fixes for my series [2] + the derived version of his on top > [3] which I thought I'd submit regardless. I do not mind flip-flopping on alternate days for a week or so. Quite honestly I do not care which ones come first all that much. All I care about is (1) we keep CI functional and (2) we do not butcher Makefile too badly in the process. Part of "functional" is "not unusably slow". Making the CI process less locked into a particular vendor and allowing the build/test with a configuration as similar as what is run on CI locally are nice to have that can come at the same time, but I wouldn't shed tears if we defer them to later, as long as they eventually materialize. If you can fix Dscho's series by adding a series on top, that sounds like one approach of lessor resistance.
