Re: [PATCH] Don't checkout the full tree if avoidable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 04:08:55AM -0700, Eric Wong wrote:
> Steven Walter wrote:
> > One criticism of the patch: the trees_match function probably needs to
> > be re-written.  My SVN::Perl-foo is weak.
> 
> Yep :)
> 
> Steven:
> 
> How does the following work for you?  Which version of SVN do you have,
> by the way?  I just found a bug with the way SVN::Client::diff() is
> exported for SVN 1.1.4, hence the SVN::Pool->new_default_sub usage.

swalter@sentra:~% svn --version
svn, version 1.3.2 (r19776)

This version works great; seems to have exactly the same behavior as my
patch.  Verified that it still falls back to the do_update code when
trees_match fails.
-- 
-Steven Walter <stevenrwalter@xxxxxxxxx>
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion,
butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance
accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders,
give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new
problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight
efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects."
   -Robert Heinlein
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux