Re: How to re-use setups in multiple tests?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In this case the first test rebases the branch created in setup (it's
testing the rebase merge strategy), the second test should do the same
thing, except check there is a warning if a --message option is
passed.

I suppose I could find the old pre-rebase head and work with that, but
that doesn't seem that clean to me.

Here's the code (non-working):

#!/bin/sh

test_description='merge-rebase backend test'

. ./test-lib.sh

test_expect_success setup '
        echo hello >a &&
        git add a &&
        test_tick && git commit -m initial &&

        git checkout -b branch &&
        echo hello >b &&
        git add b &&
        test_tick && git commit -m onbranch &&

        git checkout master &&
        echo update >a &&
        git add a &&
        test_tick && git commit -m update
'

test_expect_success 'merging using rebase does not create merge
commit' '
        git checkout branch &&
        git merge -s rebase master &&

        ( git log --pretty=oneline ) >actual &&
        (
                echo "4db7a5a013e67aa623d1fd294e8d46e89b3ace8f
onbranch"
                echo "893371811dbd13e85c098b72d1ab42bcfd24c2db update"
                echo "0e960b10429bf3f1e168ee2cc7d531ac7c622580
initial"
        ) >expected &&
        git diff -w -u expected actual
'

test_expect_success 'merging using rebase with message gives warning'
'
        #doesn't work because the branch has already been rebased and
is therefore up to date
        git checkout branch &&
        git merge -m "a message" -s rebase master 2>&1 expected &&
        (
                echo "warning: Message is not used for rebase merge
strategy"
        ) >expected &&
        git diff -w -u expected actual
'

test_done


-Tom

On 10/1/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Tom Clarke wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering if there's a pattern for re-using setups across several
> > tests, similar to how a setUp function is used in xUnit. The problem is
> > I need the setup to actually be re-run, for each test to start from a
> > clean slate, so using the following doesn't work as the setup is just
> > run before the first test.
>
> We typically do the clean up phase explicitely.  Or avoid it.
>
> Example: you want to do something to a branch, but the next step should
> use the original state of the branch.
>
> Solution: "git checkout -b new-branch HEAD~5"
>
> Sorry, unless you are a little less mysterious about the exact use case
> you have in mind, I cannot help more.
>
> Ciao,
> Dscho
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux