On Thu, Apr 14 2022, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 10:10:23PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: >> >> We could add configuration or whatever, but the topic of this thread is >> whether we should change the *default*. I think it's better to stick to >> that. > > I would have thought it was painfully obvious that changing the > *default* is a ***terrible*** idea? > > Is anyone other than the OP seriously promoting changing the default? Urm, yeah? I am, in the E-Mail upthread that replied to. The OP here is jurgen_gjoncari@xxxxxxxxxx. > If someone wants to do something terrible to their own development > workflow (or if it actually makes sense for their workflow) we could > add some configuration, but if the question is changing the default, > my ppersonal opinion is, "Heck, no!" I think you're almost certainly correct that there's worthwhile things we can catch with the current default. I just suspect that we can do so much more effectively and encourage more effectivey workflows by doing so at the point of propagation, not commit.
