Hi, On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote: > You can regard this as the beginning of the MinGW port integration. Thank you very much! This effort cannot be praised enough. > There still remain a few forks, which fall into these categories: > > - They are in tools or code that are not (yet) ported to MinGW.[*] The nice thing about the integration effort: It does not need to be done in one go. > - The fork()s are not followed by exec(). These need a different > implementation. I am thinking of a start_coroutine()/finish_coroutine() > API that is implemented with threads in MinGW. (Suggestions of a better > as well as implementations are welcome.) Is there more than the case I introduced with shallow clones? Thanks, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
