Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I wonder why we have to justify that we'll only turn on > TEST_NO_MALLOC_CHECK if it's SANITIZE=address. > > I.e. we also have SANITIZE=undefined, wouldn't it be more future-proof > to just say that these analysis options are mutually exclusive by > default? Given that the SANITIZE mechanism itself allows more than one to be requested at the same time, it is unclear to me why other checks like undefined needs to exclude checks done by other mechanisms like MALLOC_CHECK_ by default. If I correctly read under-the-three-dash commentary Phillip wrote, it's not like that use of MALLOC_CHECK_ inherently interferes with the way SANITIZE=undefined wants to work, no?
