Re: A tour of git: the basics (and notes on some unfriendly messages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



El 29/9/2007, a las 11:01, Pierre Habouzit escribió:

Many git commands output are still messy and indeed, having them in C
should help in that regard. The usual culprit are I think:

  * git fetch/clone/pull/.. ;
  * git push ;
  * git repack/gc/... ;
  * git merge (even with the merge.verbosity set to the minimum it's
    still not very readable and confusing).


I do believe that the quite verbose output git commands sometimes have
is quite confusing, and let the user think it's messy. I believe that
porcelains should be more silent, it's OK for the plumbing to spit
progress messages and so on, because people using the plumbing are able
to understand those, but porcelains should not.

I think that most people just want to know, "Did it work or not?" and so when the commands chatter too much they go into filter mode, don't really read the output, let alone try to understand it, and just skim it. Ideally Git would be much less "chattery" in general when things work, and only be more verbose when things go wrong; of course, finding that balance point is where the art lies.

Wincent

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux