Re: [PATCH v2] blame: report correct number of lines in progress when using ranges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> writes:

>> But I do not object to being more explicit.
>
> The core point though was that it can be misunderstood, thus avoiding
> the indirection, as you say, makes it more explicit for the reader.

Yup.  FWIW, I was saying that what the author wrote was not _wrong_
per-se.  I agree that being explicit here (instead of hiding behind
a pronoun) is an improvement.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux