Re: [PATCH] stash: disable literal treatment when passing top pathspec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 08 2022, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:

> On 08/04/22 10.12, Kyle Meyer wrote:
>> +test_expect_success 'stash -u works with --literal-pathspecs' '
>> +	>untracked &&
>> +	git --literal-pathspecs stash -u &&
>> +	test_path_is_missing untracked
>> +'
>
> Why not "touch untracked" instead?

The ">" form is correct here. We use "touch" when updating the timestamp
to something in particular is important, but here we're just creating an
empty file.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux